DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF24518477·sf·Civil·Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award
Hearing 17 days agoOFF CALENDAR. No proof of service for Submission of Re-Notice of Hearing on file.

DAVID PLEIMANN VS. ROBBY PHILLIPS

Re-Notice Of Hearing Re: Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerDAVID PLEIMANN
DefendantROBBY PHILLIPS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF24518477 - August 7, 2026 Hearing date: August 7, 2026 Case number: CPF24518477 Case title: DAVID PLEIMANN VS. ROBBY PHILLIPS Case Number: | | CPF24518477 | Case Title: | | DAVID PLEIMANN VS. ROBBY PHILLIPS | Court Date: | | 2026-08-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Re-Notice Of Hearing Re: Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 7, 2026. Line 1.

PETITIONER DAVID PLEIMANN Re-Notice Of Hearing Re: Petition To Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service for Submission of Re-Notice of Hearing on file (July 1, 2026 filing setting the hearing for August 7, 2026)). Proof of Service filed on July 21, 2026 references a Submission of Notice of Hearing, which was filed on June 30, 2026 setting the hearing for July 15, 2026.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share