DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-03571·merced·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 18 days agoAppearance required

[Parties’ names withheld]

Court Trial

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2026
Department
9
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Ruling

25CV-06986 Capital One, N.A. vs. Armando Castillo, Senior

Status Review of Settlement

Appearance required. Appear to address the status of settlement. If Plaintiff files a notice of conditional settlement or request for dismissal prior to the hearing, the hearing will be vacated.

26CV-02930 Justina Sosa vs. Chan Hei

Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 116.730 (Small Claims)

Appearance required.

26CV-03127 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

26CV-03571 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer

Appearance required.

26CV-03642 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]

Demurrer to Complaint

Hearing continued from July 27, 2026. The Court’s previous tentative ruling stated:

For a demurrer to the complaint in an unlawful detainer action, an opposition and reply to an opposition may be made orally at the time of the hearing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1170, subd. (c).)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share