DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-UDL-00477·sanmateo·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 18 days agoCONTINUED

CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI VS. CHRISTINA NICOLOSI, ET AL

DEFENDANT CHRISTINA NICOLOSI’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT; PLAINTIFF CLAUDIO NICOLOSI’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI
DefendantCHRISTINA NICOLOSI

Attorneys

STEVEN T. NAUMCHIKfor Plaintiff
PRO SEfor Defendant

Ruling

8/06/2026 – Law and Motion Calendar Judge: Honorable Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 3 of 4

UD LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR THURSDAY, AUGUST 06, 2026

2:00 PM LINE: 1 26-UDL-00477 CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI VS. CHRISTINA NICOLOSI, ET AL

CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI STEVEN T. NAUMCHIK CHRISTINA NICOLOSI PRO SE

DEFENDANT CHRISTINA NICOLOSI’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT – CONTINUED FROM JULY 2, 2026 HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING:

MATTER IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 27, 2026 AT 9:30 ON JUDGE MCCANNON’S SPECIAL SET CALENDAR. PLEASE CHECK THE COURT’S WEBSITE FOR ITS TENTATIVE RULING ON THE “SPECIAL SET MATTERS TENTATIVE RULINGS” LINK THE DAY PRIOR AT 3:00 PM.

8/06/2026 – Law and Motion Calendar Judge: Honorable Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 4 of 4

02:00 PM LINE: 2 26-UDL-00477 CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI VS. CHRISTINA NICOLOSI, ET AL

CLAUDIO S. NICOLOSI STEVEN T. NAUMCHIK CHRISTINA NICOLOSI PRO SE

PLAINTIFF CLAUDIO NICOLOSI’S MOTION TO STRIKE – CONTINUED FROM JULY 2, 2026 HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING:

MATTER IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 27, 2026 AT 9:30 ON JUDGE MCCANNON’S SPECIAL SET CALENDAR. PLEASE CHECK THE COURT’S WEBSITE FOR ITS TENTATIVE RULING ON THE “SPECIAL SET MATTERS TENTATIVE RULINGS” LINK THE DAY PRIOR AT 3:00 PM.

Posted: 3:00 P.M.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share