DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV180565·alameda·Civil·Anti-SLAPP
Hearing 18 days agoCONTINUED

SHADOW WOODS I LP, et al. vs SHADOW WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP)

Hearing date
Aug 6, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 1, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Anti-SLAPP Motion rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSHADOW WOODS I LP
PlaintiffSKYLINE HILLS I LP
DefendantSHADOW WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Ruling

26CV180565: SHADOW WOODS I LP, et al. vs SHADOW WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 08/06/2026 Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP) Shadow Woods I LP and Skyline Hills I LP's Complaint; filed by SHADOW WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (Defendant) CRS# 801975281647 in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 08/05/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

The Motion to Strike (Anti-Slapp) is CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 1, 2026 in light of the Court's internal calendar constraints.

The Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP) Shadow Woods I LP and Skyline Hills I LP's Complaint; filed by SHADOW WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (Defendant) CRS# 801975281647 scheduled for 08/06/2026 is continued to 10/01/2026 at 11:00 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the court’s final order on August 6, 2026 unless, by no later than 4:00 P.M. on August 5, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or selfrepresented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.

The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: “Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number].” When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.

The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.

ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice that they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share