DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV-26-003923·stanislaus·Civil·General Civil
Hearing 19 days agoDENIED

FARM 209 MANUFACTURING LLC vs BENTON, JAMES

Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Summons

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2026
Department
23
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFARM 209 MANUFACTURING LLC
DefendantBENTON, JAMES

Ruling

Because the original complaint was a nullity, the FAC commenced the first valid action in this matter. By that time the applicable statutes of limitation had expired. Plaintiff has not demonstrated a reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by further amendment. The demurrer is therefore SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. CV-26-003923 - FARM 209 MANUFACTURING LLC vs BENTON, JAMES - Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Summons - DENIED, as MOOT in view of Plaintiff's submission of a 2 nd proof of service of summons demonstrating personal service on Defendant on 7-17-26.

The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge David Hood in Department 24: ***There are no tentative rulings in Department 24*** The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no tentative rulings in Department 19***

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share