DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026PRTR065826·ventura·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing 19 days agoCONTINUED

IN RE THE MERRILL FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2011

Petition to Determine Existence of Trust and for Order Transferring Assets to Trust

Hearing date
Aug 5, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherThe Merrill Family Trust

Ruling

2026PRTR065826: IN RE THE MERRILL FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2011 08/05/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition to Determine Existence of Trust and for Order Transferring Assets to Trust

If there are any encumbrances on the real property at issue, such encumbrancers are entitled to notice. Notice to such persons must be given in the manner provided in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 413.10) in Title 5 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Prob. Code, § 851, subd. (a)(2).) This does not mean that a summons should be served but rather that the manner of service must be the same as for a summons (e.g., personal service, leaving and mailing copies, or by mail with notice and acknowledgement of receipt).

The Grant Deed provided with the petition as Exh. F shows a 50% interest given to an Anthony Merrill, not James Merrill. Discuss. Petitioner is directed to serve and file a verified supplement that provides a deed showing James Merrill’s 50% interest.

The Court will continue the matter for any required notice and the verified supplement to be served and filed.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share