DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681053·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 6 months agoOVERRULED, 5 days to answer.

SUSAN SANFORD VS. JAMES REID ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Mar 5, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffSUSAN SANFORD
DefendantJAMES REID

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681053 - March 5, 2026 Hearing date: March 5, 2026 Case number: CUD26681053 Case title: SUSAN SANFORD VS. JAMES REID ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681053 | Case Title: | | SUSAN SANFORD VS. JAMES REID ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 5, 2026. Line 6.2. DEFENDANT JAMES REID DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT; is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer.

Allegations in the complaint are sufficient to state a cause of action for unlawful detainer. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share