DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25630378·sf·Civil·Class Action
Hearing 6 months agoGRANTED

MARCOS RAMOS ET AL VS. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BUREAU

MOTION TO DISMISS

Hearing date
Mar 5, 2026
Department
302
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMarcos Ramos
PlaintiffMatthew Sacks
DefendantWorkers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, March 05, 2026, Line 11.

Plaintiffs Marcos Ramos and Matthew Sacks' unopposed Motion to Dismiss (Class Action) is GRANTED. Good cause appearing and consistent with California Rules of Court, rule 3.770, the court orders Plaintiffs may dismiss their individual and class claims without prejudice. The record demonstrates that dismissal will not prejudice class members, thus no notice to the class is required. Plaintiffs must file a request for dismissal on the Judicial Council form and should include a copy of this order with that submission. Plaintiff is ordered to prepare a proposed order consistent with the above and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share