All cases
ANTHONY SMITH vs. HARSHAD B. WADHAR, MD
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set Three
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
PlaintiffANTHONY SMITH
DefendantHARSHAD B. WADHAR, MD
Ruling
Case No. CU24-07285
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set Three
On the Court’s own motion, the motion to compel is continued to August 25, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department Seven.
YVONNE GARCIA; ET AL. vs. PRIME ASCOT, LP
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.