DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD23673389·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 6 months agoCONTINUED

POLK STREET ASSOCIATES VS. BERBER GROUP, LLC ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication As To The Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Feb 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 8, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPOLK STREET ASSOCIATES
DefendantBERBER GROUP, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 27, 2026. Line 11. PLAINTIFF POLK STREET ASSOCIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication As To The Cross-Complaint is continued to April 8, 2026 to provide the opposing party final opportunity to file a code compliant response to separate statement. Only items specified in CRC 31350(f)(2) “on the right side of the page.” Amended Separate Statement to be filed and served no later than March 13, 2026. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share