DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682213·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 20 days agoDENIED

BRIDGE BRIGHTHAVEN LLC VS. YANMIN ZHEN

Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 4, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRIDGE BRIGHTHAVEN LLC
DefendantYANMIN ZHEN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 4, 2026. Line 9. DEFENDANT YANMIN ZHEN Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment is DENIED. Moving party claims to have found out about this action after the Sherriff's posted the notice to vacate. Upon receiving this notice, Defendant purportedly contacted EDC on July 7, 2026. The writ of execution has not been issued until July 8, 2026. Defendant provides no explanation for Sheriff's posting of the Notice to vacate at least one day before the writ of execution was issued to the Sheriff. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share