DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV161701·alameda·Civil·Product Liability
Hearing 20 days agoGRANTED

GODINA, et al. vs MERCK & CO., INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time to Hear its Motion to Compel Production of Expert Documents

Hearing date
Aug 4, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGodina
DefendantMerck & Co., Inc.
DefendantWalmart Inc.

Ruling

25CV161701: GODINA, et al. vs MERCK & CO., INC., SUED INDIVIDUALLY, AS ALTER-EGO OF, AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO SCHOLL, INC. AND SCHERING-P..., et al. 08/04/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EXPERT DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFFS EXPERT WILLIAM LONGO, PH.D. in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/03/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing on its Moton to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiffs' Expert William Longo, Ph.D. is GRANTED.

The Hearing on Motion to Compel PRODUCTION OF EXPERT DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT WILLIAM LONGO, PH.D.; filed by WALMART INC. (Defendant) CRS# 199903971057 scheduled for 09/16/2026 is reset to 08/25/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Defendant Walmart's Counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share