DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025PRLP037467·ventura·Probate·Probate/Conservatorship
Hearing 20 days agoThe court orders the mandatory appearance of conservator Susan Mata; OSC re Failure to File a Petition to Fix Residence Outside State of California (GC-085) to be set.

IN THE MATTER OF JESSE JAMES MATA

Review Hearing re: filing of petition to fix residence

Hearing date
Aug 4, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJesse James Mata
OtherSusan Mata

Ruling

2025PRLP037467: IN THE MATTER OF JESSE JAMES MATA 08/04/2026 in Department J6 Review Hearing re: filing of petition to fix residence

The status report was filed on 05/15/26. The court has reviewed the status report and it is complete.

It appears conservatee and conservator have moved to Georgia since appointment and have failed to notify the court.

The court orders the mandatory appearance of conservator Susan Mata. Appearance by Zoom is approved.

As this is a limited conservatorship, a Petition to Transfer pursuant to Probate Code §2001, et seq. is unavailable.

On 05/26/26 Conservator was ordered to file and serve a noticed Petition to Fix Residence Outside State of California (GC-085) on or before 07/24/26, and set the Petition to Fix Residence for hearing on 08/04/26.

The Petition to Fix Residence Outside State of California (GC-085)has not been filed as of 07/31/26.

The court orders the mandatory appearance (remote appearance approved) of conservator Susan Mata.

The court intends to set an OSC re Failure to File a Petition to Fix Residence Outside State of California (GC-085).

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share