DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV-04088·merced·Civil·Civil
Hearing 21 days agoAppearance required

Sharee Maravilla-Sok, et al. vs Kone, INC., et al.

Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Motion for Protective Order re: Depositions; Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Ex Parte Application re: Request for Discretionary Stay; Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application to Advance the Hearing Date of Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Motion for Protective Order re: Second Elevator Inspection

Hearing date
Aug 3, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Protective Order rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSharee Maravilla-Sok
DefendantKone, INC.
DefendantOtis Elevator Company

Ruling

23CV-04088 Sharee Maravilla-Sok, et al. vs Kone, INC., et al.

Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Motion for Protective Order re: Depositions

Appearance required.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint

Appearance required.

Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Ex Parte Application re: Request for Discretionary Stay

Appearance required.

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application to Advance the Hearing Date of Defendant Otis Elevator Company’s Motion for Protective Order re: Second Elevator Inspection

Appearance required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share