Kelly Boslow, Successor in Interest to Jo M Pulos et al v. Golden Roseleaf LLC et al.
Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
4. 23CV00528 Rosinski, Melinda et al v. Piercey, Matthew, et al.
EVENT: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Requests for Production to Rodney Piercey Set No. 1 and Request for Sanctions
This discovery motion, along with all pending and future discovery motions is referred to the selected discovery referee, Douglas Robbins, Esq.
5. 25CV00962 Kelly Boslow, Successor in Interest to Jo M Pulos et al v. Golden Roseleaf LLC et al.
EVENT: Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. The Court notes that the proof of service fails to comply with CCP 1013a in that it does not state who was served and at what address. However, because Defendants have yet to appear, no notice is required, see CCP 1014. Also, in the event future motions to amend are filed, such motions should comply with the requirements of CRC 3.1324. The Court will sign the proposed order.
3|Page
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”