MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680494 - February 19, 2026 Hearing date: February 19, 2026 Case number: CUD25680494 Case title: MISSION ROCK PARCEL F, LLC VS. RAQUEL ORTIZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680494 | Case Title: | | MISSION ROCK PARCEL F, LLC VS. RAQUEL ORTIZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 19, 2026. Line 9.
DEFENDANT RAQUEL ORTIZ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. On the face of the Complaint, the Rent Ordinance applies to this tenancy. This action seeks recovery of possession on grounds that is not just cause under the Rent Ordinance. The substantive just cause limitations of the Rent Ordinance are not preempted by state law. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”