| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication
SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC25277319 - February 17, 2026 Hearing date: February 17, 2026 Case number: CGC25277319 Case title: REINHOLD HESS ET AL VS. A.B. BOYD CO. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25277319 | Case Title: | | REINHOLD HESS ET AL VS. A.B. BOYD CO. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-17 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, February 17, 2026, for 9:00 AM Department 304, Line 2.
Defendant Eaton Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Adjudication is OFF CALENDAR pursuant to Plaintiff Reinhold Hess's Notice of Death filed February 9, 2026.
Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, February 13, 2026, and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on February 17, 2026, at 3:30 p.m.
Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.
The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(304/EPS) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”