DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679719·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 6 months agoSUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

SFII 1390 MARKET STREET LLC VS. ABDUL RASHEED ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Feb 11, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSFII 1390 MARKET STREET LLC
DefendantABDUL RASHEED
DefendantSARRA ZAATOUT

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Feb. 11, 2026. Line 9. DEFENDANT SARRA ZAATOUT DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Notice to Pay Rent or Quit indicates that payment may be made personally, but fails to comply with CCP 1161(2) express requirements in the event this option is provided. This defect cannot be cured by amending the Complaint. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share