DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676618·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoHearing required.

ROBERT B. PITTS L.P. VS. RONALD CISNEROS ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Feb 4, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT B. PITTS L.P.
DefendantRONALD CISNEROS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676618 - February 4, 2026 Hearing date: February 4, 2026 Case number: CUD24676618 Case title: ROBERT B. PITTS L.P. VS. RONALD CISNEROS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676618 | Case Title: | | ROBERT B. PITTS L.P. VS. RONALD CISNEROS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 4, 2026 line 5.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Hearing required. This matter will be heard in department 305 by the Honorable Samuel K. Feng at 9:30 a.m. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 7528 4837; Password: 682119; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share