CHRISTIAN GUEVARRA VS. CHILTON'S A-1 AUTO BODY, INC., ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Final Approval Of Class Action And Paga Settlement
Motion Type Tags
Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement
Parties
- Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN GUEVARRA
- Defendant: CHILTON'S A-1 AUTO BODY, INC.
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, February 03, 2026, Line 1.
2 - Plaintiff Christian Guevarra's unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement and Judgment is GRANTED. Good cause appearing, the court grants Plaintiff's unopposed motion.
The court anticipates signing an order akin to Plaintiff's proposed order submitted with the moving papers WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: (1) from Paragraph 3, strike all text after the first semi-colon; (2) strike Paragraph 6; (3) strike Paragraph 7; (4) from Paragraph 10, strike all text after "under the Settlement," and replace the "," with "."; (5) from Paragraph 13, strike all text up to "Thus," leaving the last sentence intact other than the striking of "Thus,"; (6) from paragraph 18, strike the text in the first sentence following "only" and replace the "," with "."; and, (7) from paragraph 18, strike the last sentence.
Plaintiff's request for entry of judgment is granted provided that Plaintiff lodge a new proposed judgment and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing. Plaintiff did not submit a separate proposed judgment. The combined proposed order and judgment is not appropriate because it is combined, it contains far more than a judgment should and may omit required information. A judgment must be a spare, free-standing document that in a case such as this references the final approval order, identifies the class, the opt outs, the relief ordered (i.e., gross settlement amount and the releases), the authorized distribution of the relief, the retention of jurisdiction under CRC 3.769(h) and articulates that it is a final judgment.
If any party believes the judgment should include less or more, they will need to propose specific omissions or additions and explain why they are necessary or appropriate.
Moving Party is ordered to prepare a proposed order consistent with the above and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing. Moving Party is advised to prepare a proposed judgment and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for hearing.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |