Request for Order (RFO) for modification of custody/parenting plan; Request for child support
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 25, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
11. MEGAN HAMAN V. JUSTIN HAMAN 25FL1156
Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on February 27, 2026, requesting a modification of the child custody and parenting plan orders made on February 26, 2026. Petitioner was mail served on February 27th.
Petitioner filed an RFO on March 18, 2026, seeking child support orders. Petitioner did not concurrently file an Income and Expense Declaration, rather one was filed on March 13, 2026. Proof of Service shows Respondent was served on March 24, 2026.
Parties filed a stipulation, which the court adopted as its order, on April 28, 2026, continuing the hearing on both RFOs from May 28, 2026 to June 25, 2026.
Respondent filed an amended RFO on June 8, 2026. The Proof of Service shows a service date of April 14, 2026, which the court finds to lack credibility as the RFO was not filed until June 8th. The court drops the amended RFO from calendar, due to the lack of proper service.
Respondent also filed an Income and Expense Declaration on June 8, 2026. It also shows a service date of April 14, 2026, which once again, the court finds to lack credibility.
Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration to Respondent’s February 27th RFO on June 11, 2026. It was served on June 11th. Petitioner asserts the parties have reached agreements on the issues before the court and requests the matter be dropped as moot.
The court orders parties to appear for the hearing.
TENTATIVE RULING #11: PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”