DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV67687·tuolumne·Civil·UIM Arbitration
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company vs. Linda Mason et al

OSC re Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
RespondentLinda Mason
RespondentTimothy Boling

Attorneys

Marissa Vandersluysfor Petitioner

Ruling

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Hon: Hallie Gorman Campbell

Department 2 June 3, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

18 CV67687 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company vs. Linda Mason et al 09/29/2025

State Farm Mutual Automobile Attorney: Marissa Insurance Company Vandersluys Linda Mason Timothy Boling OSC Hearing - Sanctions Re: Dismissal 09/29/2025 Petition File Tracking 09/30/2025 High Density

This is a UIM arbitration action commenced pursuant to CA Insurance Code §11580.2(f) for the presumptively singular purpose of establishing superior court jurisdiction. There is in fact no requirement to conduct case management conferences or similar hearings in a case such as this when the parties have already agreed to arbitrate the dispute since jurisdiction is only established to allow the parties to engage the discovery machinery as part of their contractual arbitration. However, it is necessary to determine when the need for superior court jurisdiction is concluded so that the action may properly be closed. As such, it is customary to set an OSC re dismissal every 4-6 months.

It appears to this Court that the first-party arbitration has yet to take place, so this OSC re dismissal will be continued once more as a courtesy.

5/27/2026 2:07 pm

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share