DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV67062·tuolumne·Civil·Toxic Tort
Hearing 3 months agoPROVISIONALLY COMPLEX

Tommy Nguyen et al vs. Vacasa, Inc

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTommy Nguyen
DefendantVacasa, Inc

Attorneys

Ember Oparowskifor Plaintiff
Seema Bhattfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Hon: Hallie Gorman Campbell

Department 2 June 3, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

16 CV67062 Tommy Nguyen et al vs. Vacasa, Inc 03/24/2025

Tommy Nguyen Attorney: Ember Oparowski

Tommy Nguyen Attorney: Seema Bhatt

Melissa Nguyen Attorney: Ember Oparowski

Melissa Nguyen Attorney: Seema Bhatt

Zephaniah Gandeza Vacasa, Inc Elias Muniz Rodriguez Pro Per

Elizabeth Castro Pro Per

Vacasa LLC Pro Per

Theodor Naim Attorney: Ember Oparowski

Theodor Naim Attorney: Seema Bhatt

Amy Naim Attorney: Ember Oparowski

Amy Naim Attorney: Seema Bhatt

Elijah Gandeza Azariah Gandeza Jeremiah Gandeza Hezekiah Gandeza Davian Nguyen Attorney: Ember Oparowski

Davian Nguyen Attorney: Seema Bhatt Case Management Conference FURTHER 03/24/2025 Complaint File Tracking 04/22/2025 High Density

This is a toxic tort case involving allegations of carbon monoxide poisoning in a vacation rental. At the prior CMC the parties were directed to meet and confer and agree upon a trial date to occur in the early part of 2027. Based on the updated CMC statements, it does not appear as though any meet and confer has taken place. Due to the number of plaintiffs, this Court is willing to deem the matter provisionally complex in order to exempt the case from the fast track resolution requirements, but would prefer instead to see the parties expedite discovery/depositions and get this case on track for some kind of resolution.

5/27/2026 2:07 pm

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share