DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV66440·tuolumne·Civil·Lemon Law
Hearing 3 months agoPENDING

Fawn B Foster Harbour vs. FCA US, LLC

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFawn B Foster Harbour
DefendantFCA US, LLC

Attorneys

Tionna Dolinfor Plaintiff
Elizabeth McNultyfor Defendant
Christopher Waldonfor Defendant
Christopher Brownfor Defendant

Ruling

Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Hon: Hallie Gorman Campbell

Department 2 June 3, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed

10 CV66440 Fawn B Foster Harbour vs. FCA US, LLC 09/12/2024

Fawn B Foster Harbour Attorney: Tionna Dolin

FCA US, LLC Attorney: Elizabeth McNulty

FCA US, LLC Attorney: Christopher Waldon FCA US, LLC Attorney: Christopher Brown Motion Hearing - Summary Judgment Trial Setting 09/12/2024 Complaint File Tracking 07/09/2025 High Density

This is a lemon law case.

On 02/18/2026, the Commissioner granted plaintiff’s motion to continue the hearing on a defense motion for summary adjudication so that plaintiff to conduct additional discovery needed to oppose the motion. According to plaintiff, defendant was “withholding critical information” needed in the case. A new briefing schedule was established. To date, nothing new has been filed except a terse notice from plaintiff’s firm indicating that one of its former attorneys has left the firm. There is no word from either side as to whether (1) the parties will indeed stip to the Commissioner handling the law and motion, (2) the MSJ still required judicial action, or (3) if trial setting this date is even needed.

5/27/2026 2:07 pm

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share