DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680826·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoOVERRULED

ANDY K. CHEN VS. DANIEL DUONG ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 21, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANDY K. CHEN
DefendantDANIEL DUONG
DefendantPHYLLIS WONG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680826 - January 21, 2026 Hearing date: January 21, 2026 Case number: CUD25680826 Case title: ANDY K. CHEN VS. DANIEL DUONG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680826 | Case Title: | | ANDY K. CHEN VS. DANIEL DUONG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 21, 2026. Line 13. DEFENDANT DANIEL DUONG, PHYLLIS WONG DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order.

The Complaint states a cause of action. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share