| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21596771 - January 15, 2026 Hearing date: January 15, 2026 Case number: CGC21596771 Case title: MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21596771 | Case Title: | | MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL |
Court Date: | | 2026-01-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 15, 2026. Line 1.4. DEFENDANT CHRIS KELLY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE KELLY FAMILY TRUST, LARA KELLY DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED without leave to amend in part.
Demurrer as to all causes of action asserted by Humphrey and Fu is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. These plaintiffs failed to allege facts to support standing.
Demurrer as to the causes of action asserted by the LLC is OVERRULED. Complaint states sufficient facts to support each cause of action asserted by this Plaintiff. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”