WILLIAMS vs SUTTLES
Initial Case Management Conference
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
25CV160956: WILLIAMS vs SUTTLES 07/31/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 24
Tentative Ruling - 07/27/2026 Rebekah Evenson
The parties shall appear by zoom.
Plaintiffs' counsel shall be prepared to address
1. The 4/11/2024 order in criminal case no. 22-CR-006453, which provides that the deed of the property to Rose Merita Williams is void, and that "Defendant Rose Merita Williams aka Rose Williams, has no interest in the property located at 967 62nd Street, Oakland, California 94608..."
2. The 1/24/25 order in probate case no. RP23140188, which prohibits Rose Merita Williams from taking action action to encumber, transfer, or sell the property at 967 62nd Street, and the 9/15/25 Order in that case denying Rose Merita Williams' petition to confirm her ownership of that property.
Department 24 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting
The Judicial Officer prefers all parties to be on camera, and for parties to log in using their full name (first and last). This can be tested before the hearing at https://zoom.us/test.
Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/my/department24?pwd=bWVtSER4blo0ODVrZVN3N0Fua2JmZz0 9
Meeting ID: 160 6661 8377
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”