Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25625300 - January 13, 2026 Hearing date: January 13, 2026 Case number: CGC25625300 Case title: PRECILA BALABBO VS. ULTA BEAUTY, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25625300 | Case Title: | | PRECILA BALABBO VS. ULTA BEAUTY, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-13 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment | Rulings: | | Matter on calendar for Tuesday, January 13, 2026, Line 11, PLAINTIFF PRECILA BALABBO's Motion To Approve Proposition 65 Settlement And Consent Judgment.
Plaintiff Precila Balabbo's unopposed Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment is GRANTED. Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion to approve settlement pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 25249.7(f) and Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is granted.
Based on the record before it, the court finds: (1) the injunctive relief required by the settlement complies with Proposition 65; (2) the penalty amounts are reasonable based on the criteria set forth in Health and Safety Code section 25249.7(b)(2); and, (3) the award of attorney's fees is reasonable under California law.
The consent judgments shall be entered consistent with the Proposition 65 Settlement and the Parties' [Proposed] Consent Judgment. The court notes entry of judgment is not contrary to the one-judgment rule. The settlement and consent judgment is between Plaintiff and Defendant Galderma Laboratories, L.P. only, but Plaintiff previously obtained dismissals of the action as to Defendants Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Ulta Slon Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Prior to the hearing time, Moving Party shall lodge by email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org a proposed order quoting the text above verbatim. Prior to the hearing time, Moving Party must lodge by email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org a copy of the proposed consent judgment executed by all relevant parties.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |