MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL FOR PRO HAC VICE
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25629062 - January 2, 2026 Hearing date: January 2, 2026 Case number: CGC25629062 Case title: PATRICIA GOUT VS. UNISON AGREEMENT CORP. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25629062 | Case Title: | | PATRICIA GOUT VS. UNISON AGREEMENT CORP. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL FOR PRO HAC VICE | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 2, 2026. Line 5.
MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL FOR PRO HAC VICE is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and 1010.6. Verified petition and proofs of service are not executed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. (CCP 2015.5.) No proof of service on the State Bar of California. (CRC 9.40(c).) The Court also notes that the motion cites a non-existent California Rule of Court as its sole legal basis. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”