| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on January 02, 2026, Line 5.
1 - Defendants Brightline Consulting LLC, Ulrich Schmid-Maybach, Maureen Hurley and Ruth Suarez's demurrer is off calendar.
First, the court has granted Plaintiff leave to file the Second Amended Complaint. Thus, the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint is moot.
Second, Defendants failed to demonstrate compliance with their meet-and-confer responsibilities. A party demurring to a pleading must meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading "[b]efore filing [the] demurrer." (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41 (a).) The meeting must be "in person, by telephone or by video conference." (Ibid.) The meeting must take place at least five days before the date the motion must be filed. (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(a)(2.) The moving party must file a declaration with its moving papers demonstrating compliance with these requirements and/or that the opposing party failed to confer in good faith. (Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(3).)
Here, counsel's 12/2/2025 declaration does not demonstrate compliance with the meeting requirement or establish Plaintiff failed to confer in good faith. Counsel states, "Despite meet and confer efforts, Plaintiff failed to provide any response to the meet and confer efforts related to the Complaint." Counsel must identify those efforts and show they satisfy Defendants' statutory duties. This sentence does neither. Further, the representations regarding "issues with personal service" demonstrate nothing regarding meet and confer. Any subsequent demurrer for which compliance with section 430.41 is not demonstrated will be ordered off calendar.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
=(302/JMQ) | |