Motion to Vacate Judgment
Summary:
1. Omnitrans’ Request for Judicial Notice is denied.
2. Omnitrans’ demurrers to the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action in the Complaint are overruled.
3. Omnitrans’ demurrer to the Ninth Cause of Action is sustained, with leave to amend.
4. Omnitrans’ demurrers to the Tenth, Eleventh and Twelfth Causes of Action on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to comply with the Government Claims Act are overruled.
5.Omnitrans’ demurrers to the Complaint’s Tenth, Eleventh and Twelfth Causes of Action are sustained, with leave to amend on the grounds that Plaintiff’s claims are barred under the worker’s compensation exclusivity doctrine.
6. Omnitrans’ demurrer to the Thirteenth Cause of Action is sustained, without leave to amend.
7. Omnitrans’ motion to strike is denied.
8. Court continues TSC set for 6/10/2026 to 9/10/2026
Moving party is directed to give notice of ruling.
3. CASE NUMBER CASE NAME TYPE OF HEARING CIVSB22259070 Peng Liang Gang, et al v Rose Defendant Rose Chang’s Motion Chang, et al to Vacate Judgment Tentative Ruling:
Motion:
The motion is denied. Unless Defendant Rose Chang (aka Hsiu-Lan Chang) is an attorney, she may not bring a motion on behalf of Defendant Hsin-Wen Huang. Moreover, there is no proof of service showing that any other party was served with this Motion. The judicial assistant is directed to give notice of ruling.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”