Plaintiff’s motion to compel initial responses to requests for production
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 16 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj (covering this calendar for Judge Parrett) Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2270
DATE: July 29, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)
**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**
9:00 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 25CV474179 Lee Booi Lim et Click LINE 1 or scroll down for ruling. al. v. Anavarathan Ayyaswamy et al. Line 2 25CV477783 Joseph Rostam Click LINE 2 or scroll down for ruling. v. Daniel Gonzales et al. Line 3 25CV477818 K&L Supply Click LINE 3 or scroll down for ruling. Co., Inc. v. Yeo Lee Line 4 24CV434186 Guillermo Plaintiff’s motion to compel initial responses to requests for production. Bautista v. FCA (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b).)
Notice is proper and the motion is US, LLC. opposed by defendant. Defendant did not respond to the request by the statutory deadline. Defendant’s opposition contends the motion is moot because defendant has now responded to the requests for production. Defendant contends sanctions should be denied because any delay was due to an informal agreement between the law firms regarding extensions to discovery requests. Plaintiff did not file a reply. The motion is DENIED AS MOOT, and the request for sanctions is DENIED.
The court will prepare the order.
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”