Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer
Counsel has failed to demonstrate service. Neither the declaration nor proof of service filed in support of the Motion attests to the manner of service.
Clerk to give notice.
3 Pellisier vs. Motion to Consolidate Cases Gertner 30-2025- Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate is GRANTED. 01491927-CU- PN-CJC The following cases are consolidated for all purposes: (1) Case No. 2025-01491875, and (2) Case No. 2025- 01491927. Plaintiff has withdrawn his request as to Case No. 2026-01537886.
All future filings are to be submitted to the lower case number but are to reference both case numbers.
Plaintiff to give notice.
4 Romero vs. Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Duong 30-2024- Defendant Benito Lopez Diaz’s unopposed Motion for Leave 01448857-CU- to File Amended Answer is GRANTED. PA-CJC Defendant is ORDERED to file the amended answer within 5 days.
Defendant to give notice.
5 Marfone vs. Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay or Dismiss the Harvey & Action Pending Arbitration Company, LLC The Motion to Compel Arbitration by defendants Harvey & 30-2025- Company, LLC; Harvey Equity Partners, LLC; HPI Partners, 01529049-CU- LLC; and David Harvey is GRANTED. BC-CJC The complaint filed by plaintiffs Vincent Marfone, Davis Matthews, and Luke Meyers alleges eleven causes of action arising from their claims that defendants Harvey & Company, LLC (“H&C”), Harvey Equity Partners, LLC (“HEP”), HPI Partners, LLC (“HPI”), and David Harvey breached the Harvey Equity Partners LLC, Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (“HEP Agreement”) and the Limited Liability Company Agreement of HPI Partners LLC (“HPI Agreement”), and violated various sections of the Labor Code.
Defendants’ objections nos. 5, 11-14 are SUSTAINED. The remaining objections are OVERRULED.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”