Order to Show Cause
25CV137926: GONZALEZ vs SINGH, et al. 07/28/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: for Robert Reisinger in Department 19
Tentative Ruling - 07/17/2026 Joscelyn Jones
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.
UPDATED TENTATIVE RULING -JULY 23, 2026
THE COURT ORDERED THE 7/28/2026 OSC HEARING AGAINST PLAINTIFF'S ATORNEY SARA GHAFARI VACATED. NO APPEARANCE IS ORDERED OR REQUIRED OF ATTORNEY SARA GHAFARI AT THE 7/28/2026 HEARING.
________________________________________________________________ Defendant Classical Transportation's Attorney Robert Reisinger is ordered to appear in person in dept. 19 TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS OF $500.00 SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR IN PERSON AT THE 6/30/2026 CMC PER THE COURT'S ORDER.
THIS ORDER TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19 OVERRIDES THE STANDING ORDER THAT PERMITS REMOTE APPEARANCE BY ZOOM.
RULES FOR CONTESTING THIS TENTATIVE ORDER If a party wishes to contest this Tentative Case Management Order, they must indicate on-line and by emails to Department 19 and all other counsel by 11 a.m. on July 28, 2026. The matter will then be set for an in-person or on-line conference at 3:00 p.m. on either July 28, 2026, or an alternate date. If no party requests such a hearing, the Tentative Order will become final. Dept19@alameda.courts.ca.gov
Unless ordered otherwise, remote appearances by Zoom are the default for all law & motion, case management and compliance hearings in Dept.
19. Remote appearance requires an oncamera appearance by all counsel and/or parties. Every counsel and/or party who appear remotely must have a sufficient WiFi connection for substantial visual and audio connectivity with the Court. Telephone connectivity does not constitute appearance.
The Zoom link for remote appearance in Dept. 19 is: Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16079455282 Meeting ID: 160 7945 5282
Posting of this Zoom link for authorized remote appearance DOES NOT PERMIT REMOTE APPEARANCE BY ZOOM TO COUNSEL AND/OR PARTY WHO HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON IN DEPT. 19. 25CV137926: GONZALEZ vs SINGH, et al. 07/28/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: for Robert Reisinger in Department 19
When a MANDATORY in person court appearance is ordered, reliance on this Zoom link information will not be a justification, meritorious argument or good cause excuse for not appearing in person in Dept.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
19. An entry in the eCourt Portal of a Contest to this tentative case management order DOES NOT PERMIT ANY COUNSEL TO APPEAR REMOTELY BEFORE THE COURT VIA ZOOM.
Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.