In Re Kayla Rudolph
Case Information
Motion(s)
Petition to appoint a conservator
Motion Type Tags
Petition
Parties
- Petitioner: Kayla Rudolph
- Defendant: Chonghui Rudolf
- Defendant: Steve Rudolf
Attorneys
- Katie Lenore — for Defendant
Ruling
Letters shall issue. A proposed order has been submitted.
15. PR0001014 In Re Kayla Rudolph No appearances are required. On its own motion the Court continues this matter to July 31, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. The Court notes deficiencies in the petition to appoint a conservator: (1) The petition fails to indicate which powers are sought by the proposed conservator. (See Form GC-310, section 1.d. through l.). (2) The petition requests bond not be required, but does not provide a reason. (See Form GC-310 section 1.c.). (3) The petition seeks Chonghui Rudolf be appointed as conservator, but also references Steve Rudolf.
It is unclear to the Court if both parties are seeking appointment. (4) There is no proof of service of the citation. Additionally, the citation appears to be incorrectly filled out as it lists Petitioner’s name instead of the proposed conservatee. (See Form GC-320.). (5) The medical capacity declaration has not been filed. (See form GC-335.). (6) Finally, the Court has not received the court investigator’s report. Petitioner shall file and serve the outstanding items as required by law as expeditiously as possible and no later than two weeks prior to the continued court date and shall also give notice of the continued court date.
In addition, Petitioner shall provide a proposed order for appointment of a court investigator. (See form GC-330.).
Additionally, the Court appoints Katie Lenore, Esq. as counsel for the proposed conservatee. The clerk shall provide Ms. Lenore with a copy of the minutes.