JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. LJT Holdings II LLC

102 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. LJT Holdings II LLC

25-01514141 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record John P. Swenson, Janae L. Hill, and Arden Burstein (“Moving Counsel”) move to be relieved as Counsel of Record for Defendant LJT Holdings II, LLC. The instant motion to be relieved as counsel originally came on for hearing on June 16, 2026. On June 16, 2026, the Court continued the motion to July 28, 2026, and ordered Moving Counsel to file proof of service of the moving papers on the client no later than nine (9) court days before the continued hearing date. (ROA 26.)

The Court also ordered the moving party to give notice. (Ibid.) Accordingly, proof of service of the moving papers on the client was due by July 15, 2026. As of July 21, 2026, no proof of service has been filed. Additionally, there is no showing that Moving Counsel gave notice of the continuance. Based on the foregoing, the motion to be relieved as counsel of record is DENIED, without prejudice. Moving Counsel to give notice

103 Ratliff vs. Ponce

22-01255666 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 2 Sarah F. Hinks (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for plaintiffs James Ratliff and Vicki Ratliff. The motions are unopposed and Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. The moving papers were served on the clients’ last known address by mail as well as by email. However, the proof of service does not indicate that all other parties have been served, as required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(d). Moving Attorney is ordered to provide proof of service of the moving papers at or before the hearing. If Moving Attorney