DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FMS-25-387596·sf·FamilyLaw·Emergency Child Custody and Visitation
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED. Mother granted sole legal and physical custody; Father's visitation suspended.

Audrey Elizabeth Roberts v. Justin Joseph Salinas

Request for Temporary Emergency Order, Child Custody, Visitation

Hearing date
Jun 25, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAudrey Elizabeth Roberts
DefendantJustin Joseph Salinas

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 AUDREY ELIZABETH ROBERTS,) Case Number: FMS-25-387596) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 25, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JUSTIN JOSEPH SALINAS,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, CHILD CUSTODY, 13 VISITATION (PARENTING TIME) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A.

Procedural History 18 1) The parties are Petitioner Audrey Elizabeth Roberts (Mother) and Respondent Justin Joseph 19 Salinas (Father). They share one minor child: Roxanne Salinas (DOB: 11/04/21). 20 2) On May 4, 2026, Mother filed an ex parte Request for Order seeking modification of the existing 21 child custody and visitation (i.e., parenting time) orders. Mother alleges Father was arrested on 22 multiple firearms violations, including negligent discharge of a firearm. Mother requests 23 emergency orders for sole legal and sole physical custody and temporary suspension of Father’s 24 visitation, alleging visitation would be detrimental to the child’s wellbeing. 25 3) On May 18, 2026, the Court conducted a Readiness hearing.

The Court referred the parties to 26 Family Court Services (FCS) Mediation on June 12, 2026 and set a return hearing for June 25, 27 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department 403. 28 4) As of June 20, 2026, Father has not filed a Responsive Declaration. 29 B. Findings and Order

1 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 2 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 3 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 4 child(ren) is the United States. 5 2) Mother’s unopposed request for sole legal and sole physical custody of the minor child is 6 GRANTED. Effective immediately, Mother shall have sole legal and sole physical custody of 7 Roxanne Salinas (DOB: 11/04/21). 8 3) Father’s visitation is suspended and shall continue to be suspended until further order of the 9 Court.

Should Father wish to have his parenting time reinstated, he may file a Request for Order 10 explaining to the Court why it is in the child’s best interest. 11 4) All prior orders not in conflict with the orders made herein shall remain in full force and effect. 12 5) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 13

17

21

25

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share