| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Status Conference
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 04/03/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002564 Petitioner: Canepa, Gabriella Frances Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Canepa, Andre Jae Attorney: Self-Represented
1. This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.
2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. Current FL-141 does not have complete information for the type of disclosure, the date or date and delivery method of the documents. b. Amended Fl-100 Petition and FL-110 Summons on Amended Petition. Existing FL-100 does not state date of separation, duration of marriage or grounds for dissolution. The Amended documents will need to be served on Respondent.
Respondent has another 30 day period after that service to file a Response before Petitioner can ask to move the case forward. c. When the Court has the Proof of Service of the amended documents, the Court requires one of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii. Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner.
OR iii. FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141.
3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”