DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26636886·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

DAVID SILVERMAN VS. CP CLEMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CUD-26-682209, CUD-26-682276, CUD-26-682354, CUD-26-682355 WITH CASE CGC-26-636886

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDAVID SILVERMAN
DefendantCP CLEMENT, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 23, 2026. Line 7. PLAINTIFF DAVID SILVERMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS OF CASE(S) CUD-26-682209, CUD-26-682276, CUD-26-682354, CUD-26-682355 WITH CASE CGC-26-636886 is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005. Motion filed on July 6, 2026 for July 23, 2026 hearing. No proof of service on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share