Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class and PAGA Settlement
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
(03) Tentative Ruling
Re: Rodriguez v. Valleywide Farm Labor, Inc. Case No. 22CECG01009
Hearing Date: July 23, 2026 (Dept. 502)
Motion: Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class and PAGA Settlement
Tentative Ruling:
To grant plaintiff’s motion for final approval of class and PAGA settlement.
Explanation:
1. Class Certification
The court has already granted preliminary approval of the request for certification of the class for the purpose of settlement. Nothing has changed that would cause the court to change its ruling. In fact, the lack of any objections from the class indicates that the class members agree that the class should be certified. Therefore, the court intends to grant certification of the class for the purpose of settlement.
2. Fairness and Reasonableness of the Settlement The court has already granted preliminary approval of the settlement, including finding that the amount of the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable. After the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement, the class administrator served notice of the settlement on the class members, and no objections and only two requests for exclusion have been received. The class members’ lack of objections supports a finding that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Therefore, the court intends to grant final approval of the settlement amount.
3. Attorney’s Fees and Costs The court has already granted preliminary approval of the request for attorney’s fees and costs. No class members have objected to the settlement or the requested fees and costs. Therefore, the court intends to grant final approval of the requested attorney’s fees and costs.
4. Payment to Class Representative The court has already granted preliminary approval of the $7,500 incentive award to the named plaintiff. No class members have objected to the requested incentive award. Therefore, the court intends to grant final approval of the incentive award to the named plaintiff.
5. Payment to Class Administrator
The court has already granted preliminary approval of the $8,000 payment to the administrator. No class members have objected to the $8,000 payment. Therefore, the court intends to grant final approval of the payment to the administrator.
6. PAGA Settlement The court has already found that settling the PAGA claims for $7,500 is fair, adequate and reasonable. Nothing has changed since the court’s preliminary ruling that would cause it to change its ruling. Therefore, the court intends to grant final approval of the PAGA portion of the settlement.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: lmg on 7-20-26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
4