DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21CV000351·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 1 month agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

RAPHAEL, et al. vs KAGNO, et al.

Status Conference

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
517
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRAPHAEL
DefendantKAGNO

Ruling

21CV000351: RAPHAEL, et al. vs KAGNO, et al. 07/22/2026 Status Conference in Department 517

Tentative Ruling - 07/16/2026 Keith Fong

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. At the 5/13/2026 hearing the Parties agreed that Court should set a hearing date in 60 days to allow the parties to further explore settlement. Plaintiffs filed a case management statement but it does not provide an update as to those discussions. No statement was filed by Defendant.

ZOOM LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR DEPARTMENT 517 IS BELOW.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16181989812

Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 One tap mobile +16692545252,,16181989812# US (San Jose) 16692161590,,16181989812# US +(San Jose)

IF APPEARING BY ZOOM, VIDEO MUST BE ENABLED. THE COURT DOES NOT ALLOW APPEARANCES BY PHONE WITHOUT PRIOR LEAVE OF COURT.

Dial by your location +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose) +1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose) +1 551 285 1373 US +1 646 828 7666 US (New York) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 Find your local number: https://www.zoomgov.com/u/ad6x1ZH23d

Join by SIP 16181989812@sip.zoomgov.com

Join by H.323 161.199.138.10 (US West) 161.199.136.10 (US East) Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share