DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV474776·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoUNOPPOSED and GRANTED. Demurrer sustained with 15 days leave to amend.

Kevin Lu vs COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Demurrer to the complaint by Defendant County of Santa Clara erroneously sued as Main Jail Medical Department

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKevin Lu
DefendantCounty of Santa Clara

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 16 Honorable William J. Monahan, Presiding (covering this calendar for Judge Parrett) Courtroom Clerk, 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2270

DATE: 7/22/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 2 25CV474776 Kevin Lu vs COUNTY OF Hearing: Demurrer SANTA CLARA erroneously sued as Main Jail Medical to the complaint by Defendant County of Santa Clara erroneously sued as Department Main Jail Medical Department

UNOPPOSED and GRANTED. Good cause appearing, the demurrer to all causes of action in the complaint by defendant County of Santa Clara erroneously sued as Main Jail Medical Department (Defendant) is SUSTAINED WITH 15 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.

Defendant’s request for judicial notice is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED.

The court will prepare the order. LINE 3 25CV473804 PEDRO BOSCHI vs MEGAN Hearing: Demurrer ALLEN et al to the Complaint of plaintiff Pedro Boschi by Defendant AMR DARWISH

Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 3 for tentative ruling. The court will prepare the order. LINE 4 25CV468644 Jpmorgan Chase Bank N.a. Motion: Admissions Deemed Admitted vs Javier Zuniga Request for Admissions of Truth of facts be deem admitted filed by Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.

UNOPPOSED and GRANTED. Good cause appearing, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 2023.010 et seq. and 2033.280 the truth of all specified facts in the Request for Admissions (RFA), Set One, propounded by plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (Plaintiff) on defendant Javier Zuniga (Defendant) by mail on 08/11/2025 are DEEDMED ADMITTED by Defendant. Defendant failed to timely serve any response to the RFA, Set One.

The court will prepare the order. (Note: Please attach copy of RFA, Set One, pages 8-20 from motion filed 2/27/2026 to order as Exhibit 1.) LINE 5 25CV481480 MELISSA IKEDA et al vs Motion: Compel FCA US LLC et al Initial disclosures pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26 and for monetary sanctions for Plaintiffs MELISSA IKEDA and HIDEO IDEDA

Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 5 for tentative ruling. The court will prepare the order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share