DEMURRER to 3RD Amended COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623983 - July 21, 2026 Hearing date: July 21, 2026 Case number: CGC25623983 Case title: KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623983 | Case Title: | | KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 21, 2026. Line 3.1.
DEFENDANT RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS DEMURRER to 3RD Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR.
Parties are ordered to meet and confer in accordance with CCP 430.41 in person, by phone or via video conference. Declaration of Demurring party filed on June 24, 2026 does not attest to meet and confer by any of the above means. Parties shall meet and confer on a mutually agreed upon date no later than August 7, 2026. If parties cannot agree, parties shall meet and confer in person at 1:30 p.m. on August 5, 2026 at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”