Notice Of Motion For An Order Severing Defendant Sutro Property Management, Inc.'S Cross-Complaint From The Main Action
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622853 - July 21, 2026 Hearing date: July 21, 2026 Case number: CGC25622853 Case title: GINNY BROWN VS. CRAIG VIEHWEG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622853 | Case Title: | | GINNY BROWN VS. CRAIG VIEHWEG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For An Order Severing Defendant Sutro Property Management, Inc.'S Cross-Complaint From The Main Action | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 21, 2026. Line 2. PLAINTIFF GINNY BROWN Notice Of Motion For An Order Severing Defendant Sutro Property Management, Inc.'S Cross-Complaint From The Main Action is continued to September 11, 2026 for the Cross-Complainant to effectuate service. Cross-Complainant to file a supplemental declaration no later than September 8, 2026 addressing service. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. is continued to September 11, 2026 for the Cross-Complainant to effectuate service. Cross-Complainant to file a supplemental declaration no later than September 8, 2026 addressing service. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”