DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR000118·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Estate of Rickey Samuel James Cypher

STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

Conservatorship of Sabino Munoz Gomez 25PR000069

REVIEW – 1ST YEAR

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co- Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on June 09, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

Estate of Rickey Samuel James Cypher 25PR000118

STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. Pursuant to Probate Code section 12200, a personal representative is required to either petition for an order for final distribution of the estate or make a report of status of administration not later than one year after the date of issuance of letters. There is no petition for final distribution or status report on file. Appearance is required to show the condition of the estate, the reasons why the estate cannot be distributed and closed, and an estimate of time needed to close administration of the estate. (Prob. Code, § 12202, subd. (a).)

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Jane Doe v. Joseph Tolfree et al 23CV000759

APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the file that version of the Ex Parte Application filed under seal on June 29, 2026.

Defendant Duffy’s Napa Valley Rehab (Duffy’s) applies for an order continuing the August 3, 2026, trial date in this matter to November 21, 2026, or a date thereafter, and to reset all deadlines from the continued trial date. Duffy’s makes its application on grounds that it needs additional time “to obtain discovery from previously undisclosed medical providers relating to plaintiff's damage claims.” (Ex Parte Application at 1:23-2:2.)

A. NO SHOWING IS MADE TO FILE THE EX PARTE APPLICATION UNDER SEAL

On June 29, 2026, Duffy’s submitted redacted and unredacted versions of its ex parte application. The unredacted version has the following stamped across the top of each page,

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share