| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion for an Order Compelling Mental Examination
(34) Tentative Ruling
Re: Valdez v. Maggini & Sons Trucking LLC, et al. Superior Court Case No. 25CECG01959
Hearing Date: May 12, 2026 (Dept. 502)
Motion: by Defendants for an Order Compelling Mental Examination of Plaintiffs
Tentative Ruling:
To take off calendar due to moving party’s failure to comply with Fresno Superior Court Local Rule 2.1.17 before filing the motion.
Explanation:
This motion is brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2032.310 2032.320, and is therefore subject to Local Rule 2.1.17, which explicitly applies to all motions under sections 2016.010 through 2036.050 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (See Local Rule 2.1.17(A).) Defendant has not filed a request for Pretrial Discovery Conference regarding this discovery dispute, or obtained permission to file the motion as required by the Local Rule.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: KCK on 05/11/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
3
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”