Lorena Zuniga Montelongo v. Bianco Winegrowing

of access to the subject Property as a matter of law. (See Metropolitan Water Dist. of So. California v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc. (2007) 41 Cal.4th 954, 971 [“whether a taking has substantially impaired access to the remaining property is ‘a matter of law’ for the court”].)

Based on the foregoing, the Court determines that the interference described in Issue 3 is not a compensable item of damage that may be considered when valuing severance damages in this action. (Id. at 971-72 [noting that the substantial impairment determination is a predicate to an award of severance damages].)

Dave Van Pelt v. Walmart, Inc. et al 25CV001124

TRANSFER OUT HEARING TO CONFIRM ACCEPTANCE OF CASE BY PLACER COUNTY

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. While Plaintiff filed a Notice of Deposit of Processing Fees for the Change of Venue on April 29, 2026, in which he represented that two checks were deposited for the processing and transfer fees payable to Napa Court and Placer Court, the Napa Court Clerk has recently advised that it has not received any such payment and therefore the transfer of the case has not yet commenced. Plaintiff’s counsel’s appearance is required to provide a status update on the transfer fee payment.

McGrew Behavior Intervention Services, Inc. v. Israel Delgado 25CV001274

[1] DEFENDANT ISRAEL DELGADO’S MOTION TO STRIKE (ANTI-SLAPP)

APPEARANCE REQUIRED: The Parties are ordered to appear to inform the Court regarding the status of the proceedings and, if appropriate, to reset hearing on the instant motion.

[2] APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

APPEARANCE REQUIRED: The Parties are ordered to appear to inform the Court regarding the status of the proceedings and, if appropriate, to reset the continued hearing on the instant motion.

Lorena Zuniga Montelongo v. Bianco Winegrowing 25CV001906

DEFENDANT BIANCO WINEGROWING’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS