| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion to Enforce Order
April 3, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings
7. 25CV1827 EL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES vs. WEBB, ET AL Motion to Enforce Order
A Petition was filed on July 15, 2025, accompanied by a Stipulation and Order executed by Petitioner and Respondents establishing that Respondents’ dog “Rio” is a potentially dangerous dog as defined in El Dorado County Ordinance 6.12.050(B). The Stipulation and Order required Respondent to take certain specified measures detailed in the Order, dated July 18, 2025.
Petitioner’s motion claims that Respondent has not complied with the Stipulation and Order and requests authority from the Court to enforce the terms of the Order. No Opposition to the Petition has been filed.
TENTATIVE RULING #7: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON FRIDAY, APRIL 3, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.
LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.
9
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”