Or v. Eyedeology Optometry

# Case Name Tentative

50.

51. Lee v. Yaling Plaintiff Jacky Lee’s motion for leave to file a third amended Zhou, complaint is GRANTED. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. Trustee of (a)(1); Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, the Yaling 761.) Family Trust Dated June Plaintiff is ORDERED to separately file a copy of the proposed 15, 2023 third amended complaint within two court days. The third amended complaint must be filed as a separate document to 2025- ensure it is properly indexed in the record. Plaintiff is also 01499696 ordered to serve the third amended complaint.

The case management conference is continued to November 23, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C28.

Plaintiff shall give notice of this ruling.

52. Or v. Plaintiffs Lok Or, Shahrzad Yazdan, and Wendy Pham’s Motion Eyedeology for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Optometry (See Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.) 2024- 01409445 Plaintiffs are ORDERED to separately file a copy of the proposed second amended complaint within two court days. The second amended complaint must be filed as a separate document to ensure it is properly indexed in the record. Plaintiffs are also ordered to serve the second amended complaint.

The case management conference is scheduled for November 23, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department C28.

The order to show cause is discharged.

Plaintiffs shall give notice of this ruling.

53. Ragland v. Defendant County of Orange’s demurrer to first amended County of complaint is SUSTAINED with 10 days leave to amend as to Orange the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th causes of action for negligence, property damage/conversion, negligent infliction of emotional 2023- distress, and violation of the California Constitution, article I, 01358379 § 1 (right to privacy); and SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to all other causes of action.