DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2023-01338201-CU-PO-CJC·orange·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Foerster vs. The City of Laguna Niguel

Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
C31
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Feb 26, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFoerster
DefendantThe City of Laguna Niguel

Ruling

2 Espinoza Aceves Motion to Consolidate Cases vs. Southern California Edison Defendant/cross-complainant Southern California Edison Company Company’s (SCE) Motion to Consolidate is DENIED 30-2024- without prejudice. 01436382-CU- PO-CJC SCE has not complied with California Rules of Court, rule 3.350, subd. (a)(1)(C) as it has not filed notices of the motion to consolidate in each case sought to be consolidated.

Clerk to give notice.

3 David Dyrnaes Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint as Trustee for the David Neil Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to file second Dyrnaes and amended complaint is GRANTED. Mayumi Nagakura Joint Amendments to pleadings are liberally allowed in Living Trust, furtherance of justice, and trial has not yet begun. Dated August 11, 2010 vs. City Plaintiff is ORDERED to file and serve the second of Laguna Beach amended complaint within two court days. 30-2025- 01519061-CU- Clerk to give notice. WM-CJC 4 Foerster vs. The Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint City of Laguna Niguel Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file third amended complaint 30-2023- is GRANTED. 01338201-CU- PO-CJC Amendments to pleadings are liberally allowed in furtherance of justice, and trial has not yet begun.

Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file and serve the third amended complaint within two court days.

Trial is CONTINUED to 2/26/2027 at 11:30 AM. The court re-opens discovery for the limited purpose of the newly- added cause of action. The new discovery cutoff is to run with the new trial date.

Clerk to give notice.

5 Meriplex Motion to Impose a Cost Obligation and Stay Case Communications, Defendant Rocker Solenoid Company, d/b/a Rocker LTD. vs. Rocker Solenoid Industries’ unopposed motion requiring Plaintiff to post an undertaking to secure costs and attorney fees is Company GRANTED.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share